The American mainstream media and Big Tech (e.g., Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter) have worked hard to condition the public to believe their narratives. If you don't buy the "official" version of their messages--or worse, if you speak out against them-- you are ridiculed, shamed, canceled, and de-platformed. Any alternate interpretation of world events that goes against their "truth" is labeled as a "conspiracy theory" and summarily dismissed.
But what happens when there are so many coincidences that events begin to look "conspiratorial?" How many coincidences does it take to convince us to question things more deeply?
According to the Oxford dictionary, a coincidence is defined as, "a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances that have no apparent causal connection with one another."
We are now two years into the global pandemic catastrophe with no end in sight. In this post, I want to point out some...shall we say, "coincidences" (i.e., remarkable concurrences) that I, along with many others, are questioning. To avoid being called a "conspiracy theorist," I'm identifying as more of a "coincidence theorist." Although, I will keep my tin-foil hat close by...
Note: Much of the information outlined below is compiled from a 2-hour special on the pandemic timeline entitled, "Crimes or Cover-up; Exposing the World's Most Dangerous Lie," produced and aired by Glenn Beck on BlazeTV. No matter what you think of Glenn, this documentary is well worth your time. The fact that YouTube has not taken it down and labeled it as "misinformation" should be your first clue that it is factual. There is no conjecture. Every fact that is presented is backed-up by the actual documents from the parties involved; many of which are linked below.
First some historical background on how this all got started:
The experimentation with coronaviruses has been taking place for over 20 years. It didn't just happen in the last two years. Post 9/11, researchers have been looking for ways to take a virus found in nature, tweak it genetically to force it to "jump" species, and then try to create a vaccine to combat it. This is a very basic explanation of "gain-of-function," which we have heard a lot about recently. Some scientists believe that this is a way to protect humanity in the event of a global pandemic. Other scientists, however, believe these experiments could potentially create a "Frankenstein virus" which, if it escaped, could go horribly wrong and become a planet-killer. We've all seen those movies!
Here is a timeline of important events that have taken place over the years leading up to where we are now. Taken individually, they don't appear all that unusual. But when looked at from a larger perspective, well...you decide.
In October 2005, Dr. Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina published a paper on SARS-CoV infectious-cloned DNA genetics in humanized mice. Just TWO months later, in December 2005, after Dr. Baric's paper was published, the U.S. government passed an emergency appropriations bill to address hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico and...coincidentally, to also fund the "Pandemic Influenza Act, 2006." Hmmm...what do hurricanes and infectious viruses even have in common?
Buried deep within this emergency appropriations bill was the little-noticed fact that the government, coincidentally, granted liability waivers to companies working on Emergency Use Authorization vaccines. That action meant that there can be no lawsuits filed against pharmaceutical companies if anyone is injured as a result of a vaccine developed under the Emergency Use Authorization.
Because of major concerns over dangerous "gain-of-function" research, the White House, in October 2014, put a halt to funding the risky research. However, research continued at the Wuhan Virology lab in China, funded by our taxpayer money that was funneled through Ecohealth Alliance. Coincidentally, Ecohealth Alliance is a third-party organization acting on behalf of Dr. Fauci's National Institute of Health (NIH).
In 2015, the U.S. government began negotiating with the pharmaceutical company, Moderna, to transfer the government research on mRNA technology to Moderna in exchange for the government sharing OWNERSHIP of the patent on the technology.
Now...fast forward to 2019.
On September 12, 2019, three months before any of us knew there was a danger, the Wuhan lab suddenly shut down all access to their database containing data on 22,000 viruses. They said they were hacked.
Coincidentally, in October 2019, 10 hospitals around Wuhan were treating patients with "flu-like" symptoms. In late October, the World Military Games were held in Wuhan with 100,000 athletes from foreign countries in attendance. Coincidentally, athletes had their temperatures checked upon arrival in Wuhan. Dozens of attendees subsequently became ill with a mysterious "flu-like" illness and then returned to their home countries.
On December 3, 2019, the Wuhan lab placed an order to purchase an air incinerator device. Did they, coincidentally, have a need to dispose of more medical waste (i.e., lab animals, virus samples, documents)?
A few days later, the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, was finally identified in Wuhan. However, it is believed that the identification had been made MUCH earlier.
On December 12, 2019, after negotiating with Moderna since 2015, and after reports that Wuhan lab researchers were hospitalized after contracting a viral infection, the U.S. government and Moderna signed the patent-sharing agreement. Were you aware that our government owns one-half of the patent on the mRNA vaccine?
On December 31, 2019, the first COVID-19 cases were finally reported to the WHO (World Health Organization).
Whoa...seems like a lot of coincidences.
But here are a few more:
Dr. Rochelle Walensky, Director of the CDC, has informed the world that the coronavirus vaccines do not stop the spread of the virus, nor do they keep you from getting the virus. They are, therefore, therapeutics. But a multitude of studies have shown that there are other therapeutics that are highly effective in treating and preventing COVID-19. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are two of the front-runners. Both have been completely trashed and banned by the government. WHY? And now, Pfizer is developing a "new" therapeutic pill that works using very similar mechanisms as the cheap, readily available, Nobel-prize winning, FDA-approved, Ivermectin (the drug that the mainstream media has branded a "horse de-wormer"). What a coincidence.
Another therapeutic prescribed for hospitalized COVID-19 patients is Remdesivir. Coincidentally, the U.S. government spent $162 million on Remdesivir development. However, its use is questionable, and the side effects can be severe. Is it a coincidence that it is the only therapeutic permitted in hospital COVID-19 treatment protocols? The Wuhan Institute of Virology also applied for a patent for Remdesivir in China.
And here are a few more:
On August 30, 2020, the FDA promised that their review of any potential COVID-19 vaccine would be transparent and driven by data only. It's now being reported that the FDA says it may not release any information on the COVID-19 vaccines until 2076. That's 55 years from now! How convenient. So much for transparency. Coincidence?
A graph presented by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., uses the CDC's own data to show that deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines exceed deaths from ALL vaccines combined over the last 30 years. Kennedy has recently published a best-selling book entitled, "The Real Anthony Fauci" that shines a light on this, and so much more.
Are all these data points just coincidence? Or do they point to some kind of coordinated collusion?
I don't know. Remember...I'm just a coincidence theorist.
But what I DO know is that theses coincidences lead to more questions.
Is the push for vaccine mandates related to the fact that the government has ownership in the vaccine?
Does the fact that vaccine manufacturers have immunity from liability allow the CDC and FDA to ignore the number of deaths caused by the vaccine (i.e., 18,853 through November 12, 2021, which is TWICE the number of all vaccine deaths combined since 1990)?
As a point of reference, in 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled after only 32 deaths and 500 cases of the debilitating disease known as Guillain-Barre Syndrome became attributable to the vaccine.
Does banning highly-effective therapeutics (Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine) have anything to do with the fact that they are exceedingly cheap and there is no money to be made by Big Pharma or our government as a joint partner?
Why aren't we allowed to have open, uncensored debate about one of the biggest events in human history? And why all the censorship of scientists and doctors who present substantive research and results differing from the "approved" COVID-19 narrative?
Why does the mainstream media refuse to report on tens of thousands of global protestors marching against their governments' draconian vaccine mandates and lockdowns?
Why does the CDC seem to be totally unconcerned about the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) data? Here are the latest numbers posted by the CDC in the system, through November 12, 2021:
894.143 Total Adverse Events
139,952 Doctor Visits
99,470 Urgent Care
30,010 Permanently Disabled
11,229 Bell’s Palsy
9,332 Heart Attacks
These numbers are shocking. However, a Harvard research grant-funded study of the VAERS system determined that less than 1% of all adverse events are even reported to VAERS. There is NO mandate that requires healthcare professionals to report adverse events; and many choose to opt out of the process entirely. The study, therefore, concluded that the adverse event numbers in VAERS are vastly understated.
Yet, coincidentally, according to Dr. Fauci, the vaccine is 100% safe and effective.
How many coincidences have to happen before they're no longer a...
To make sure you receive future posts, please enter your email in the field below.
Your information will never be shared.